Alfa Romeo Mito vs Škoda Rapid
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,682
- $1,656 (better)
- Australia
- $1,395
- $1,374 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,022
- £1,006 (better)
- United States
- $1,299
- $1,279 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.2 L/100km
- 5.1 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 865 km
- 1,074 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 4
- 5
- Boot
- 270 L
- 550 L (better)
- Length
- 4,063 mm
- 4,483 mm
- Weight
- 1,155 kg
- 1,170 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 1.4 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 1.2 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- 57 kW
- 81 kW (better)
- Torque
- 120 Nm
- 175 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed manual
- 7-speed dual-clutch
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Mito or Rapid?
Which uses less fuel, the Alfa Romeo Mito or the Škoda Rapid?
The Škoda Rapid, at 5.1 L/100km (55 mpg UK, 46 mpg US) to the Alfa Romeo Mito's 5.2 L/100km (54 mpg UK, 45 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Which has the bigger boot, the Alfa Romeo Mito or the Škoda Rapid?
The Škoda Rapid, at 550 L to the Alfa Romeo Mito's 270 L, for their newest versions.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
