Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Roush Performance F150
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $5,433 (better)
- $5,850
- Australia
- $4,507 (better)
- $4,851
- United Kingdom
- £3,301 (better)
- £3,554
- United States
- $4,197 (better)
- $4,520
Official figures
- Uses
- 16.8 L/100km (better)
- 18.1 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 536 km
- –
Space
- Seats
- 5
- –
- Boot
- 548 L
- –
- Length
- 5,762 mm
- –
- Weight
- 2,560 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 6.75 L V12 twin-turbo petrol
- –
- Power
- 420 kW
- –
- Torque
- 900 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 8-speed automatic
- –
- Drive
- RWD
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Phantom or F150?
Which uses less fuel, the Rolls-Royce Phantom or the Roush Performance F150?
The Rolls-Royce Phantom, at 16.8 L/100km (17 mpg UK, 14 mpg US) to the Roush Performance F150's 18.1 L/100km (16 mpg UK, 13 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
- Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Maserati Quattroporte
- Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Dodge Charger
- Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Chrysler 300
- Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Lexus Is
- Roush Performance F150 vs Ferrari 812 GTS
- Roush Performance F150 vs Ferrari 812 Superfast
- Roush Performance F150 vs Ferrari Daytona SP3
- Roush Performance F150 vs Ferrari Monza SP1
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
