Mazda Axela vs Toyota Aqua
The Aqua costs less to run, by the official figures: about £100 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £650
- £546 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,070
- $899 (better)
- Australia
- $887
- $746 (better)
- United States
- $827
- $695 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 85 mpg
- 102 mpg (better)
- Also
- 3.3 L/100km
- 2.8 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 957 miles (better)
- 805 miles
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 392 L
- –
- Length
- 4,460 mm
- 4,050 mm
- Weight
- 1,350 kg
- 1,120 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 1.5 L 3-cylinder petrol hybrid (M15A-FXE)
- Power
- 114 kW (better)
- 85 kW
- Torque
- 200 Nm (better)
- 120 Nm
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- CVT
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Axela or Aqua?
Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda Axela or the Toyota Aqua?
The Toyota Aqua: about £100 a year less in the UK than the Mazda Axela at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Mazda Axela or the Toyota Aqua?
The Toyota Aqua, at 2.8 L/100km (102 mpg UK, 85 mpg US) to the Mazda Axela's 3.3 L/100km (85 mpg UK, 71 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
