BMW 630I vs Ford EcoSport

Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.

Ford EcoSport

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

BMW 630IFord EcoSport

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$2,157 (better)
$2,167
Australia
$1,789 (better)
$1,797
United Kingdom
£1,310 (better)
£1,316
United States
$1,667 (better)
$1,674

Official figures

Uses
6.7 L/100km (better)
6.7 L/100km
On a full tank
–
761 km

Space

Seats
–
5
Boot
–
309 L
Length
–
4,272 mm
Weight
–
1,351 kg

Engine

Engine
–
1.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
Power
–
87 kW
Torque
–
162 Nm
Gearbox
–
6-speed automatic
Drive
–
FWD

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

630I or EcoSport?

Which uses less fuel, the BMW 630I or the Ford EcoSport?

The BMW 630I, at 6.7 L/100km (42 mpg UK, 35 mpg US) to the Ford EcoSport's 6.7 L/100km (42 mpg UK, 35 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way