Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Triton
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $2,445 (better)
- $2,471
- Australia
- $2,026 (better)
- $2,049
- United Kingdom
- £1,485 (better)
- £1,501
- United States
- $1,889 (better)
- $1,909
Official figures
- Uses
- 7.6 L/100km (better)
- 7.6 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 1,058 km (better)
- 982 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 1,059 L
- –
- Towing, braked
- 3,500 kg (better)
- 3,100 kg
- Length
- 5,370 mm
- 5,280 mm
- Weight
- 2,176 kg
- 1,920 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder twin-turbo diesel
- 2.4 L 4-cylinder turbo-diesel
- Power
- 154 kW (better)
- 133 kW
- Torque
- 500 Nm (better)
- 430 Nm
- Gearbox
- 10-speed automatic
- 5-speed automatic
- Drive
- 4WD
- 4WD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- 9 (better)
- 7
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Ranger or Triton?
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Ranger or the Mitsubishi Triton?
The Ford Ranger, at 7.6 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US) to the Mitsubishi Triton's 7.6 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
