Mazda Axela vs Nissan Note
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,070 (better)
- $1,132
- Australia
- $888 (better)
- $939
- United Kingdom
- £650 (better)
- £688
- United States
- $827 (better)
- $874
Official figures
- Uses
- 3.3 L/100km (better)
- 3.5 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 1,541 km (better)
- 1,029 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 392 L (better)
- 280 L
- Length
- 4,460 mm
- 4,045 mm
- Weight
- 1,350 kg
- 1,230 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 1.2 L 3-cylinder petrol engine (series hybrid; drives generator)
- Power
- 114 kW (better)
- 85 kW
- Torque
- 200 Nm
- 280 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- Single-speed reduction gear
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★☆
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Axela or Note?
Which uses less fuel, the Mazda Axela or the Nissan Note?
The Mazda Axela, at 3.3 L/100km (85 mpg UK, 71 mpg US) to the Nissan Note's 3.5 L/100km (81 mpg UK, 67 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Which has the bigger boot, the Mazda Axela or the Nissan Note?
The Mazda Axela, at 392 L to the Nissan Note's 280 L, for their newest versions.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
