Mercedes-Benz A200 vs Mitsubishi Colt
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,714 (better)
- $1,730
- Australia
- $1,420 (better)
- $1,435
- United Kingdom
- £1,041 (better)
- £1,051
- United States
- $1,324 (better)
- $1,337
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.3 L/100km (better)
- 5.4 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 811 km
- 879 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 370 L (better)
- 203 L
- Length
- 4,419 mm
- 3,870 mm
- Weight
- 1,395 kg
- 1,015 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 1.3 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- 1.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 120 kW (better)
- 80 kW
- Torque
- 250 Nm (better)
- 140 Nm
- Gearbox
- 7-speed dual-clutch
- 5-speed manual
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
A200 or Colt?
Which uses less fuel, the Mercedes-Benz A200 or the Mitsubishi Colt?
The Mercedes-Benz A200, at 5.3 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US) to the Mitsubishi Colt's 5.4 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Which has the bigger boot, the Mercedes-Benz A200 or the Mitsubishi Colt?
The Mercedes-Benz A200, at 370 L to the Mitsubishi Colt's 203 L, for their newest versions.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
