Mitsubishi L200 vs Volkswagen Amarok
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $3,396
- $2,059 (better)
- Australia
- $2,816
- $2,544 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £2,063
- £1,800 (better)
- United States
- $2,623 (better)
- $2,847
Official figures
- Uses
- 10.5 L/100km
- 8.0 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 714 km
- 988 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Towing, braked
- 3,100 kg (better)
- 3,000 kg
- Length
- 5,305 mm
- 5,192 mm
- Weight
- 1,930 kg
- 2,040 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.4 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder twin-turbo diesel
- Power
- 133 kW
- 157 kW (better)
- Torque
- 430 Nm
- 525 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- 8-speed automatic
- Drive
- 4WD
- 4WD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★☆
- Airbags
- –
- 4
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
L200 or Amarok?
Which uses less fuel, the Mitsubishi L200 or the Volkswagen Amarok?
The Volkswagen Amarok, at 8.0 L/100km (35 mpg UK, 29 mpg US) to the Mitsubishi L200's 10.5 L/100km (27 mpg UK, 22 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
