BMW 316 vs Holden Equinox
The Equinox costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,863
- $1,856 (better)
- Australia
- $1,543
- $1,539 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,132
- £1,128 (better)
- United States
- $1,439
- $1,434 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.8 L/100km
- 5.7 L/100km (better)
- UK
- 49 mpg
- 49 mpg (better)
- US
- 41 mpg
- 41 mpg (better)
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
316 or Equinox?
Which is cheaper to run, the BMW 316 or the Holden Equinox?
The Holden Equinox: about $10 a year less in New Zealand than the BMW 316 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the BMW 316 or the Holden Equinox?
The Holden Equinox, at 5.7 L/100km (49 mpg UK, 41 mpg US) to the BMW 316's 5.8 L/100km (49 mpg UK, 41 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
