Haval H9 vs McLaren GT

The GT costs less to run, by the official figures: about $30 a year less in New Zealand, $30 in Australia, £20 in the UK and $20 in the US.

Haval H9

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Haval H9McLaren GT

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$3,525
$3,493 (better)
Australia
$2,921
$2,894 (better)
United Kingdom
£2,142
£2,122 (better)
United States
$2,723
$2,698 (better)

Official figures

Uses
10.9 L/100km
10.8 L/100km (better)
UK
26 mpg
26 mpg (better)
US
22 mpg
22 mpg (better)
On a full tank
734 km
–

Space

Seats
7
–
Length
4,856 mm
–

Engine

Engine
2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
–
Power
180 kW
–
Torque
360 Nm
–
Gearbox
8-speed automatic
–
Drive
4WD
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

H9 or GT?

Which is cheaper to run, the Haval H9 or the McLaren GT?

The McLaren GT: about $30 a year less in New Zealand, $30 in Australia, £20 in the UK and $20 in the US than the Haval H9 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Haval H9 or the McLaren GT?

The McLaren GT, at 10.8 L/100km (26 mpg UK, 22 mpg US) to the Haval H9's 10.9 L/100km (26 mpg UK, 22 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way