KGM Torres vs Suzuki S-cross

The S-cross costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in New Zealand, $20 in Australia, £10 in the UK and $20 in the US.

Suzuki S-cross

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

KGM TorresSuzuki S-cross

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$1,918
$1,895 (better)
Australia
$1,590
$1,572 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,165
£1,151 (better)
United States
$1,482
$1,464 (better)

Official figures

Uses
5.9 L/100km
5.9 L/100km (better)
UK
48 mpg
48 mpg (better)
US
40 mpg
40 mpg (better)
On a full tank
–
802 km

Space

Seats
–
5
Boot
–
430 L
Length
–
4,300 mm

Engine

Engine
–
1.4 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol mild hybrid
Power
–
95 kW
Torque
–
235 Nm
Gearbox
–
6-speed automatic
Drive
–
FWD

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Torres or S-cross?

Which is cheaper to run, the KGM Torres or the Suzuki S-cross?

The Suzuki S-cross: about $20 a year less in New Zealand, $20 in Australia, £10 in the UK and $20 in the US than the KGM Torres at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the KGM Torres or the Suzuki S-cross?

The Suzuki S-cross, at 5.9 L/100km (48 mpg UK, 40 mpg US) to the KGM Torres's 5.9 L/100km (48 mpg UK, 40 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way