Audi e-tron vs Azure Dynamics Transit Connect Electric Van
The e-tron costs less to run, by the official figures: about $290 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,151 (better)
- $1,439
- Australia
- $983 (better)
- $1,229
- United Kingdom
- £747 (better)
- £934
- United States
- $1,049 (better)
- $1,312
Official figures
- Uses
- 26.8 kWh/100km (better)
- 33.6 kWh/100km
- Range
- 363 km (better)
- 90 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- –
- Length
- 4,901 mm
- –
- Weight
- 2,565 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- Dual motor
- –
- Power
- 300 kW
- –
- Torque
- 664 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- Single-speed
- –
- Drive
- AWD
- –
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
e-tron or Transit Connect Electric Van?
Which is cheaper to run, the Audi e-tron or the Azure Dynamics Transit Connect Electric Van?
The Audi e-tron: about $290 a year less in New Zealand than the Azure Dynamics Transit Connect Electric Van at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
- Audi e-tron vs Jaguar I-Pace
- Audi e-tron vs Tesla Model X
- Audi e-tron vs Hyundai Ioniq 5
- Audi e-tron vs Volkswagen ID.4
- Azure Dynamics Transit Connect Electric Van vs Jaguar I-Pace
- Azure Dynamics Transit Connect Electric Van vs Rolls-Royce Spectre
- Azure Dynamics Transit Connect Electric Van vs Mercedes-Benz Eqe
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
