Bentley Mulsanne vs Ferrari FF

The Mulsanne costs less to run, by the official figures: about $80 a year less in New Zealand.

Bentley Mulsanne

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Bentley MulsanneFerrari FF

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$4,896 (better)
$4,980
Australia
$4,062 (better)
$4,132
United Kingdom
£2,975 (better)
£3,026
United States
$3,783 (better)
$3,848

Official figures

Uses
15.1 L/100km (better)
15.4 L/100km
On a full tank
528 km
–

Space

Seats
4
–
Length
5,575 mm
–
Weight
2,585 kg
–

Engine

Engine
6.75 L V8 twin-turbo petrol
–
Power
377 kW
–
Torque
1,020 Nm
–
Gearbox
8-speed automatic
–
Drive
RWD
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Mulsanne or FF?

Which is cheaper to run, the Bentley Mulsanne or the Ferrari FF?

The Bentley Mulsanne: about $80 a year less in New Zealand than the Ferrari FF at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Bentley Mulsanne or the Ferrari FF?

The Bentley Mulsanne, at 15.1 L/100km (19 mpg UK, 16 mpg US) to the Ferrari FF's 15.4 L/100km (18 mpg UK, 15 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way