Ford Puma vs MG HS
The HS costs less to run, by the official figures: about $30 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,714
- $1,682 (better)
- Australia
- $1,421
- $1,393 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,041
- £1,022 (better)
- United States
- $1,324
- $1,299 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.3 L/100km
- 5.2 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 792 km
- 1,058 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 456 L
- 507 L (better)
- Length
- 4,186 mm
- 4,670 mm
- Weight
- 1,280 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 1.0 L 3-cylinder turbo petrol mild hybrid
- 1.5 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- 92 kW
- 125 kW (better)
- Torque
- 170 Nm
- 275 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed manual
- 7-speed dual-clutch
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Puma or HS?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Puma or the MG HS?
The MG HS: about $30 a year less in New Zealand than the Ford Puma at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Puma or the MG HS?
The MG HS, at 5.2 L/100km (54 mpg UK, 45 mpg US) to the Ford Puma's 5.3 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Which has the bigger boot, the Ford Puma or the MG HS?
The MG HS, at 507 L to the Ford Puma's 456 L, for their newest versions.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
