Holden Acadia vs Mercedes-Benz S63

Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.

Holden Acadia

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Holden AcadiaMercedes-Benz S63

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$2,995 (better)
$2,998
Australia
$2,484 (better)
$2,486
United Kingdom
£1,819 (better)
£1,821
United States
$2,314 (better)
$2,316

Official figures

Uses
9.3 L/100km (better)
9.3 L/100km
On a full tank
788 km
–

Space

Seats
7
–
Length
4,979 mm
–
Weight
1,950 kg
–

Engine

Engine
3.6 L V6 petrol
–
Power
231 kW
–
Torque
367 Nm
–
Gearbox
9-speed automatic
–
Drive
AWD
–

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Acadia or S63?

Which uses less fuel, the Holden Acadia or the Mercedes-Benz S63?

The Holden Acadia, at 9.3 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 25 mpg US) to the Mercedes-Benz S63's 9.3 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way