Jeep Commander vs Kia K2900

The K2900 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $670 a year less in New Zealand.

Jeep Commander

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Jeep CommanderKia K2900

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$3,331
$2,656 (better)
Australia
$2,760 (better)
$3,282
United Kingdom
£2,024 (better)
£2,322
United States
$2,573 (better)
$3,673

Official figures

Uses
10.3 L/100km (better)
10.3 L/100km
On a full tank
757 km
–

Space

Seats
7
–
Boot
1,028 L
–
Length
4,787 mm
–
Weight
2,345 kg
–

Engine

Engine
3.7 L V6 petrol
–
Power
157 kW
–
Torque
319 Nm
–
Gearbox
5-speed automatic
–
Drive
4WD
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Commander or K2900?

Which is cheaper to run, the Jeep Commander or the Kia K2900?

The Kia K2900: about $670 a year less in New Zealand than the Jeep Commander at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Jeep Commander or the Kia K2900?

The Jeep Commander, at 10.3 L/100km (27 mpg UK, 23 mpg US) to the Kia K2900's 10.3 L/100km (27 mpg UK, 23 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way