Mazda CX-30 vs Mercury Milan

The CX-30 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in New Zealand.

Mazda CX-30

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Mazda CX-30Mercury Milan

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$1,940 (better)
$1,950
Australia
$1,610 (better)
$1,617
United Kingdom
£1,179 (better)
£1,185
United States
$1,499 (better)
$1,507

Official figures

Uses
6.0 L/100km (better)
6.0 L/100km
On a full tank
850 km
–

Space

Seats
5
–
Boot
317 L
–
Length
4,395 mm
–
Weight
1,370 kg
–

Engine

Engine
2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
–
Power
114 kW
–
Torque
200 Nm
–
Gearbox
6-speed automatic
–
Drive
FWD
–

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–
Euro NCAP
★★★★★
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

CX-30 or Milan?

Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda CX-30 or the Mercury Milan?

The Mazda CX-30: about $10 a year less in New Zealand than the Mercury Milan at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Mazda CX-30 or the Mercury Milan?

The Mazda CX-30, at 6.0 L/100km (47 mpg UK, 39 mpg US) to the Mercury Milan's 6.0 L/100km (47 mpg UK, 39 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way