Mazda CX-9 vs Mercedes-Benz E240
The E240 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $2,907
- $2,894 (better)
- Australia
- $2,412
- $2,400 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,766
- £1,758 (better)
- United States
- $2,246
- $2,236 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 9.0 L/100km
- 9.0 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 823 km
- –
Space
- Seats
- 7
- –
- Length
- 5,075 mm
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- –
- Power
- 170 kW
- –
- Torque
- 420 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- –
- Drive
- AWD
- –
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
CX-9 or E240?
Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda CX-9 or the Mercedes-Benz E240?
The Mercedes-Benz E240: about $10 a year less in New Zealand than the Mazda CX-9 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Mazda CX-9 or the Mercedes-Benz E240?
The Mercedes-Benz E240, at 9.0 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 26 mpg US) to the Mazda CX-9's 9.0 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 26 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
