Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Nissan Bluebird
The Giulia costs less to run, by the official figures: about £40 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £1,198 (better)
- £1,242
- New Zealand
- $1,973 (better)
- $2,044
- Australia
- $1,637 (better)
- $1,695
- United States
- $1,524 (better)
- $1,579
Official figures
- Uses
- 46 mpg (better)
- 45 mpg
- Also
- 6.1 L/100km (better)
- 6.3 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 591 miles (better)
- 511 miles
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 480 L
- –
- Length
- 4,650 mm
- 4,620 mm
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- 1.8 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 206 kW (better)
- 93 kW
- Torque
- 400 Nm (better)
- 174 Nm
- Gearbox
- 8-speed automatic
- –
- Drive
- RWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Giulia or Bluebird?
Which is cheaper to run, the Alfa Romeo Giulia or the Nissan Bluebird?
The Alfa Romeo Giulia: about £40 a year less in the UK than the Nissan Bluebird at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Alfa Romeo Giulia or the Nissan Bluebird?
The Alfa Romeo Giulia, at 6.1 L/100km (46 mpg UK, 39 mpg US) to the Nissan Bluebird's 6.3 L/100km (45 mpg UK, 37 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
