Aston Martin Lagonda vs Rolls-Royce Camargue
The Lagonda costs less to run, by the official figures: about £640 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £5,136 (better)
- £5,776
- New Zealand
- $8,454 (better)
- $9,508
- Australia
- $7,004 (better)
- $7,878
- United States
- $6,531 (better)
- $7,346
Official figures
- Uses
- 11 mpg (better)
- 10 mpg
- Also
- 26.1 L/100km (better)
- 29.4 L/100km
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Lagonda or Camargue?
Which is cheaper to run, the Aston Martin Lagonda or the Rolls-Royce Camargue?
The Aston Martin Lagonda: about £640 a year less in the UK than the Rolls-Royce Camargue at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Aston Martin Lagonda or the Rolls-Royce Camargue?
The Aston Martin Lagonda, at 26.1 L/100km (11 mpg UK, 9 mpg US) to the Rolls-Royce Camargue's 29.4 L/100km (10 mpg UK, 8 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
- Aston Martin Lagonda vs Rolls-Royce Silver Spirit
- Aston Martin Lagonda vs Lamborghini Aventador
- Aston Martin Lagonda vs Bentley Brooklands
- Aston Martin Lagonda vs Ferrari 575
- Rolls-Royce Camargue vs Lamborghini Countach
- Rolls-Royce Camargue vs Lamborghini Aventador
- Rolls-Royce Camargue vs Bentley Brooklands
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
