Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Aura
The Aura costs less to run, by the official figures: about £40 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £766
- £727 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,261
- $1,197 (better)
- Australia
- $1,045
- $992 (better)
- United States
- $974
- $924 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 72 mpg
- 76 mpg (better)
- Also
- 3.9 L/100km
- 3.7 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 797 miles
- –
Space
- Seats
- 5
- –
- Boot
- 361 L
- –
- Length
- 4,351 mm
- –
- Weight
- 1,384 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- –
- Power
- 126 kW
- –
- Torque
- 222 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- CVT
- –
- Drive
- FWD
- –
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Kona or Aura?
Which is cheaper to run, the Hyundai Kona or the Nissan Aura?
The Nissan Aura: about £40 a year less in the UK than the Hyundai Kona at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Hyundai Kona or the Nissan Aura?
The Nissan Aura, at 3.7 L/100km (76 mpg UK, 64 mpg US) to the Hyundai Kona's 3.9 L/100km (72 mpg UK, 60 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
