Jeep Commander vs Kia K2900
The Commander costs less to run, by the official figures: about £300 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £2,024 (better)
- £2,322
- New Zealand
- $3,331
- $2,656 (better)
- Australia
- $2,763 (better)
- $3,282
- United States
- $2,573 (better)
- $3,673
Official figures
- Uses
- 27 mpg (better)
- 27 mpg
- Also
- 10.3 L/100km (better)
- 10.3 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 471 miles
- –
Space
- Seats
- 7
- –
- Boot
- 1,028 L
- –
- Length
- 4,787 mm
- –
- Weight
- 2,345 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 3.7 L V6 petrol
- –
- Power
- 157 kW
- –
- Torque
- 319 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 5-speed automatic
- –
- Drive
- 4WD
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Commander or K2900?
Which is cheaper to run, the Jeep Commander or the Kia K2900?
The Jeep Commander: about £300 a year less in the UK than the Kia K2900 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Jeep Commander or the Kia K2900?
The Jeep Commander, at 10.3 L/100km (27 mpg UK, 23 mpg US) to the Kia K2900's 10.3 L/100km (27 mpg UK, 23 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
