Lincoln Nautilus vs Mazda CX-5
The CX-5 costs less to run, by the official figures: about £10 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £1,540
- £1,530 (better)
- New Zealand
- $2,535
- $2,519 (better)
- Australia
- $2,102
- $2,091 (better)
- United States
- $1,959
- $1,946 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 36 mpg
- 36 mpg (better)
- Also
- 7.8 L/100km
- 7.8 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 539 miles (better)
- 447 miles
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 442 L
- Towing, braked
- –
- 1,800 kg
- Length
- 4,826 mm
- 4,550 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,558 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 183 kW (better)
- 115 kW
- Torque
- 373 Nm (better)
- 200 Nm
- Gearbox
- 8-speed automatic
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- AWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- –
- 6
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Nautilus or CX-5?
Which is cheaper to run, the Lincoln Nautilus or the Mazda CX-5?
The Mazda CX-5: about £10 a year less in the UK than the Lincoln Nautilus at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Lincoln Nautilus or the Mazda CX-5?
The Mazda CX-5, at 7.8 L/100km (36 mpg UK, 30 mpg US) to the Lincoln Nautilus's 7.8 L/100km (36 mpg UK, 30 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
