Mazda CX-3 vs MG ZS
The ZS costs less to run, by the official figures: about £60 a year less in the UK.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United Kingdom
- £982
- £923 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,617
- $1,520 (better)
- Australia
- $1,340
- $1,260 (better)
- United States
- $1,249
- $1,174 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 56 mpg
- 60 mpg (better)
- Also
- 5.0 L/100km
- 4.7 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 597 miles
- 635 miles (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 351 L
- –
- Length
- 4,275 mm
- 4,313 mm
- Weight
- 1,270 kg
- 1,211 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 1.0 L 3-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- 88 kW (better)
- 80 kW
- Torque
- 203 Nm (better)
- 151 Nm
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- 6
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
CX-3 or ZS?
Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda CX-3 or the MG ZS?
The MG ZS: about £60 a year less in the UK than the Mazda CX-3 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Mazda CX-3 or the MG ZS?
The MG ZS, at 4.7 L/100km (60 mpg UK, 50 mpg US) to the Mazda CX-3's 5.0 L/100km (56 mpg UK, 47 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
