BMW 340I vs Mazda CX-90

The 340I costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in the US.

BMW 340I

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

BMW 340IMazda CX-90

A typical year's fuel

United States
$2,124 (better)
$2,149
New Zealand
$2,749 (better)
$2,781
Australia
$2,278 (better)
$2,304
United Kingdom
£1,670 (better)
£1,690

Official figures

Uses
28 mpg (better)
27 mpg
Also
8.5 L/100km (better)
8.6 L/100km
On a full tank
417 miles
–

Space

Seats
5
–
Boot
480 L
–
Length
4,709 mm
–
Weight
1,595 kg
–

Engine

Engine
3.0 L 6-cylinder turbo petrol
–
Power
240 kW
–
Torque
450 Nm
–
Gearbox
8-speed automatic
–
Drive
RWD
–

Safety

Euro NCAP
★★★★★
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

340I or CX-90?

Which is cheaper to run, the BMW 340I or the Mazda CX-90?

The BMW 340I: about $20 a year less in the US than the Mazda CX-90 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the BMW 340I or the Mazda CX-90?

The BMW 340I, at 8.5 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 28 mpg US) to the Mazda CX-90's 8.6 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 27 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way