BMW 525D vs Ford Puma
The Puma costs less to run, by the official figures: about $560 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $1,886
- $1,324 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,364 (better)
- $1,714
- Australia
- $1,685
- $1,421 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,192
- £1,041 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 44 mpg
- 44 mpg
- Also
- 5.3 L/100km
- 5.3 L/100km
- On a full tank
- –
- 492 miles
Space
- Seats
- –
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 456 L
- Length
- –
- 4,186 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,280 kg
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 1.0 L 3-cylinder turbo petrol mild hybrid
- Power
- –
- 92 kW
- Torque
- –
- 170 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- 6-speed manual
- Drive
- –
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
525D or Puma?
Which is cheaper to run, the BMW 525D or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma: about $560 a year less in the US than the BMW 525D at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
