Chevrolet SSR vs KGM Rexton
The SSR costs less to run, by the official figures: about $930 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $2,211 (better)
- $3,142
- New Zealand
- $2,862
- $2,273 (better)
- Australia
- $2,374 (better)
- $2,808
- United Kingdom
- £1,739 (better)
- £1,986
Official figures
- Uses
- 27 mpg
- 27 mpg (better)
- Also
- 8.9 L/100km
- 8.8 L/100km (better)
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
SSR or Rexton?
Which is cheaper to run, the Chevrolet SSR or the KGM Rexton?
The Chevrolet SSR: about $930 a year less in the US than the KGM Rexton at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Chevrolet SSR or the KGM Rexton?
The KGM Rexton, at 8.8 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 27 mpg US) to the Chevrolet SSR's 8.9 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 27 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
