Citroën Xsara vs Toyota Progres

The Xsara costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in the US.

Citroën Xsara

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Citroën XsaraToyota Progres

A typical year's fuel

United States
$2,149 (better)
$2,156
New Zealand
$2,781 (better)
$2,791
Australia
$2,305 (better)
$2,315
United Kingdom
£1,690 (better)
£1,696

Official figures

Uses
27 mpg (better)
27 mpg
Also
8.6 L/100km (better)
8.6 L/100km
On a full tank
434 miles
–

Space

Seats
5
–
Boot
408 L
–
Length
4,191 mm
–
Weight
1,141 kg
–

Engine

Engine
1.6 L 4-cylinder petrol
–
Power
80 kW
–
Torque
147 Nm
–
Gearbox
5-speed manual
–
Drive
FWD
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Xsara or Progres?

Which is cheaper to run, the Citroën Xsara or the Toyota Progres?

The Citroën Xsara: about $10 a year less in the US than the Toyota Progres at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Citroën Xsara or the Toyota Progres?

The Citroën Xsara, at 8.6 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 27 mpg US) to the Toyota Progres's 8.6 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 27 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way