Ford Endura vs Saab 9-3
The 9-3 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $690 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $2,338
- $1,649 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,691 (better)
- $2,134
- Australia
- $2,089
- $1,770 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,478
- £1,297 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 36 mpg (better)
- 36 mpg
- Also
- 6.6 L/100km (better)
- 6.6 L/100km
- On a full tank
- –
- 546 miles
Space
- Seats
- –
- 5
- Length
- –
- 4,648 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,400 kg
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 1.8 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- –
- 110 kW
- Torque
- –
- 240 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- 5-speed manual
- Drive
- –
- FWD
Safety
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Endura or 9-3?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Endura or the Saab 9-3?
The Saab 9-3: about $690 a year less in the US than the Ford Endura at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Endura or the Saab 9-3?
The Ford Endura, at 6.6 L/100km (43 mpg UK, 36 mpg US) to the Saab 9-3's 6.6 L/100km (43 mpg UK, 36 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
