Ford Ranger vs GWM Cannon

The Ranger costs less to run, by the official figures: about $220 a year less in the US.

Ford RangerGWM Cannon

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Ford RangerGWM Cannon

A typical year's fuel

United States
$1,889 (better)
$2,106
New Zealand
$2,445 (better)
$2,726
Australia
$2,027 (better)
$2,261
United Kingdom
£1,485 (better)
£1,656

Official figures

Uses
31 mpg (better)
28 mpg
Also
7.6 L/100km (better)
8.4 L/100km
On a full tank
658 miles
–

Space

Seats
5
5
Boot
1,059 L
–
Towing, braked
3,500 kg
–
Length
5,370 mm
–
Weight
2,176 kg
–

Engine

Engine
2.0 L 4-cylinder twin-turbo diesel
2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
Power
154 kW
–
Torque
500 Nm
–
Gearbox
10-speed automatic
8-speed automatic
Drive
4WD
4WD

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–
Airbags
9
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Ranger or Cannon?

Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Ranger or the GWM Cannon?

The Ford Ranger: about $220 a year less in the US than the GWM Cannon at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Ford Ranger or the GWM Cannon?

The Ford Ranger, at 7.6 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US) to the GWM Cannon's 8.4 L/100km (34 mpg UK, 28 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way