Ford Territory vs Mazda CX-9
The Territory costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $2,239 (better)
- $2,246
- New Zealand
- $2,898 (better)
- $2,907
- Australia
- $2,404 (better)
- $2,412
- United Kingdom
- £1,760 (better)
- £1,766
Official figures
- Uses
- 26 mpg (better)
- 26 mpg
- Also
- 9.0 L/100km (better)
- 9.0 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 416 miles
- 511 miles (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 7
- Boot
- 420 L
- –
- Towing, braked
- 2,250 kg
- –
- Length
- 4,630 mm
- 5,075 mm
- Weight
- 1,675 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 1.8 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- 138 kW
- 170 kW (better)
- Torque
- 318 Nm
- 420 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 7-speed dual-clutch
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- AWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- 6
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Territory or CX-9?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Territory or the Mazda CX-9?
The Ford Territory: about $10 a year less in the US than the Mazda CX-9 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Territory or the Mazda CX-9?
The Ford Territory, at 9.0 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 26 mpg US) to the Mazda CX-9's 9.0 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 26 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
