Holden Trax vs Škoda Karoq
The Trax costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $1,674 (better)
- $1,691
- New Zealand
- $2,167 (better)
- $2,189
- Australia
- $1,797 (better)
- $1,816
- United Kingdom
- £1,316 (better)
- £1,330
Official figures
- Uses
- 35 mpg (better)
- 35 mpg
- Also
- 6.7 L/100km (better)
- 6.8 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 482 miles (better)
- 459 miles
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 521 L
- Length
- 4,248 mm
- 4,382 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,400 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 1.4 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- 1.5 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- 103 kW
- 110 kW (better)
- Torque
- 200 Nm
- 250 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- 7-speed dual-clutch
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Trax or Karoq?
Which is cheaper to run, the Holden Trax or the Škoda Karoq?
The Holden Trax: about $20 a year less in the US than the Škoda Karoq at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Holden Trax or the Škoda Karoq?
The Holden Trax, at 6.7 L/100km (42 mpg UK, 35 mpg US) to the Škoda Karoq's 6.8 L/100km (42 mpg UK, 35 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
