Holden Utility vs Mazda CX-9
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $2,249
- $2,246 (better)
- New Zealand
- $2,911
- $2,907 (better)
- Australia
- $2,412
- $2,410 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,768
- £1,766 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 26 mpg
- 26 mpg (better)
- Also
- 9.0 L/100km
- 9.0 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- –
- 511 miles
Space
- Seats
- –
- 7
- Length
- –
- 5,075 mm
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- –
- 170 kW
- Torque
- –
- 420 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- –
- AWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Utility or CX-9?
Which uses less fuel, the Holden Utility or the Mazda CX-9?
The Mazda CX-9, at 9.0 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 26 mpg US) to the Holden Utility's 9.0 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 26 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
