Jeep Compass vs Mazda CX-9
The Compass costs less to run, by the official figures: about $70 a year less in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- United States
- $2,176 (better)
- $2,246
- New Zealand
- $2,817 (better)
- $2,907
- Australia
- $2,337 (better)
- $2,412
- United Kingdom
- £1,711 (better)
- £1,766
Official figures
- Uses
- 27 mpg (better)
- 26 mpg
- Also
- 8.7 L/100km (better)
- 9.0 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 428 miles
- 511 miles (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 7
- Boot
- 438 L
- –
- Length
- 4,394 mm
- 5,075 mm
- Weight
- 1,500 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 2.4 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- Power
- 129 kW
- 170 kW (better)
- Torque
- 229 Nm
- 420 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- 6-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- AWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Airbags
- 7
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Compass or CX-9?
Which is cheaper to run, the Jeep Compass or the Mazda CX-9?
The Jeep Compass: about $70 a year less in the US than the Mazda CX-9 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Jeep Compass or the Mazda CX-9?
The Jeep Compass, at 8.7 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 27 mpg US) to the Mazda CX-9's 9.0 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 26 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
