Mazda Bongo vs Nissan Caravan

The Caravan costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in the US.

Mazda BongoNissan Caravan

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Mazda BongoNissan Caravan

A typical year's fuel

United States
$2,074
$2,051 (better)
New Zealand
$2,684
$2,655 (better)
Australia
$2,225
$2,200 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,631
£1,613 (better)

Official figures

Uses
28 mpg
29 mpg (better)
Also
8.3 L/100km
8.2 L/100km (better)
On a full tank
–
492 miles

Space

Seats
3
3

Engine

Engine
2.2 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
2.5 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
Gearbox
5-speed manual
–
Drive
RWD
RWD

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Bongo or Caravan?

Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda Bongo or the Nissan Caravan?

The Nissan Caravan: about $20 a year less in the US than the Mazda Bongo at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Mazda Bongo or the Nissan Caravan?

The Nissan Caravan, at 8.2 L/100km (34 mpg UK, 29 mpg US) to the Mazda Bongo's 8.3 L/100km (34 mpg UK, 28 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way