Mazda Bongo vs Volkswagen Transporter

The Transporter costs less to run, by the official figures: about $70 a year less in the US.

Mazda BongoVolkswagen Transporter

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Mazda BongoVolkswagen Transporter

A typical year's fuel

United States
$2,074
$1,999 (better)
New Zealand
$2,684
$2,587 (better)
Australia
$2,225
$2,144 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,631
£1,572 (better)

Official figures

Uses
28 mpg
29 mpg (better)
Also
8.3 L/100km
8.0 L/100km (better)
On a full tank
–
544 miles

Space

Seats
3
3
Length
–
4,904 mm

Engine

Engine
2.2 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo-diesel
Power
–
81 kW
Torque
–
250 Nm
Gearbox
5-speed manual
5-speed manual
Drive
RWD
FWD

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Bongo or Transporter?

Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda Bongo or the Volkswagen Transporter?

The Volkswagen Transporter: about $70 a year less in the US than the Mazda Bongo at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Mazda Bongo or the Volkswagen Transporter?

The Volkswagen Transporter, at 8.0 L/100km (35 mpg UK, 29 mpg US) to the Mazda Bongo's 8.3 L/100km (34 mpg UK, 28 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way