Acura RSX vs BMW M4
The M4 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,521
- $2,505 (better)
- New Zealand
- $3,043
- $3,024 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,849
- £1,837 (better)
- United States
- $2,351
- $2,336 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 9.4 L/100km
- 9.4 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 531 km
- 631 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 4
- 4
- Boot
- –
- 440 L
- Length
- 4,366 mm
- 4,794 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,730 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 3.0 L 6-cylinder twin turbo petrol
- Power
- 116 kW
- 375 kW (better)
- Torque
- 190 Nm
- 650 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 5-speed manual
- 8-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- RWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
RSX or M4?
Which is cheaper to run, the Acura RSX or the BMW M4?
The BMW M4: about $20 a year less in Australia than the Acura RSX at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Acura RSX or the BMW M4?
The BMW M4, at 9.4 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US) to the Acura RSX's 9.4 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
