Bentley Continental vs Holden Ute

The Continental costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in Australia.

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Bentley ContinentalHolden Ute

A typical year's fuel

Australia
$3,001 (better)
$3,014
New Zealand
$3,622 (better)
$3,638
United Kingdom
£2,200 (better)
£2,210
United States
$2,798 (better)
$2,811

Official figures

Uses
11.2 L/100km (better)
11.3 L/100km
On a full tank
804 km
–

Space

Seats
4
–
Length
4,850 mm
–

Engine

Engine
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo petrol
–
Power
404 kW
–
Torque
770 Nm
–
Gearbox
8-speed dual-clutch
–
Drive
AWD
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Continental or Ute?

Which is cheaper to run, the Bentley Continental or the Holden Ute?

The Bentley Continental: about $10 a year less in Australia than the Holden Ute at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Bentley Continental or the Holden Ute?

The Bentley Continental, at 11.2 L/100km (25 mpg UK, 21 mpg US) to the Holden Ute's 11.3 L/100km (25 mpg UK, 21 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way