BMW 630 vs Kia Stonic

The 630 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in Australia.

Kia Stonic

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

BMW 630Kia Stonic

A typical year's fuel

Australia
$1,442 (better)
$1,447
New Zealand
$1,740 (better)
$1,746
United Kingdom
£1,057 (better)
£1,061
United States
$1,344 (better)
$1,349

Official figures

Uses
5.4 L/100km (better)
5.4 L/100km
On a full tank
–
833 km

Space

Seats
–
5
Boot
–
352 L
Length
–
4,140 mm
Weight
–
1,195 kg

Engine

Engine
–
1.0 L 3-cylinder turbo petrol
Power
–
73 kW
Torque
–
172 Nm
Gearbox
–
6-speed manual
Drive
–
FWD

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

630 or Stonic?

Which is cheaper to run, the BMW 630 or the Kia Stonic?

The BMW 630: about $10 a year less in Australia than the Kia Stonic at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the BMW 630 or the Kia Stonic?

The BMW 630, at 5.4 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US) to the Kia Stonic's 5.4 L/100km (52 mpg UK, 44 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way