BMW M3 vs Chevrolet Cobalt
The Cobalt costs less to run, by the official figures: about $30 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,205
- $2,173 (better)
- New Zealand
- $2,662
- $2,623 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,617
- £1,593 (better)
- United States
- $2,056
- $2,026 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 8.2 L/100km
- 8.1 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 729 km (better)
- 592 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 391 L
- Length
- 4,671 mm
- 4,583 mm
- Weight
- 1,560 kg
- 1,294 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 3.0 L 6-cylinder twin-turbo petrol
- 2.2 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 317 kW (better)
- 118 kW
- Torque
- 550 Nm (better)
- 210 Nm
- Gearbox
- 7-speed dual-clutch
- 5-speed manual
- Drive
- RWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
M3 or Cobalt?
Which is cheaper to run, the BMW M3 or the Chevrolet Cobalt?
The Chevrolet Cobalt: about $30 a year less in Australia than the BMW M3 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the BMW M3 or the Chevrolet Cobalt?
The Chevrolet Cobalt, at 8.1 L/100km (35 mpg UK, 29 mpg US) to the BMW M3's 8.2 L/100km (34 mpg UK, 29 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
