BMW XM vs Leapmotor C10

The C10 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $220 a year less in Australia.

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

BMW XMLeapmotor C10

A typical year's fuel

Australia
$514
$295 (better)
New Zealand
$621
$356 (better)
United Kingdom
£377
£216 (better)
United States
$480
$275 (better)

Official figures

Uses
1.9 L/100km
1.1 L/100km (better)

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

XM or C10?

Which is cheaper to run, the BMW XM or the Leapmotor C10?

The Leapmotor C10: about $220 a year less in Australia than the BMW XM at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the BMW XM or the Leapmotor C10?

The Leapmotor C10, at 1.1 L/100km (257 mpg UK, 214 mpg US) to the BMW XM's 1.9 L/100km (147 mpg UK, 123 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way