Chevrolet Impala vs Mitsubishi 380
The Impala costs less to run, by the official figures: about $30 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,867 (better)
- $2,894
- New Zealand
- $3,457 (better)
- $3,493
- United Kingdom
- £2,100 (better)
- £2,122
- United States
- $2,671 (better)
- $2,698
Official figures
- Uses
- 10.7 L/100km (better)
- 10.8 L/100km
- On a full tank
- 636 km
- 648 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 408 L
- –
- Length
- 5,113 mm
- 4,905 mm
- Weight
- 1,724 kg
- 1,550 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 3.8 L V6 petrol
- Power
- 145 kW
- 175 kW (better)
- Torque
- 260 Nm
- 343 Nm (better)
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- 5-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Impala or 380?
Which is cheaper to run, the Chevrolet Impala or the Mitsubishi 380?
The Chevrolet Impala: about $30 a year less in Australia than the Mitsubishi 380 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Chevrolet Impala or the Mitsubishi 380?
The Chevrolet Impala, at 10.7 L/100km (26 mpg UK, 22 mpg US) to the Mitsubishi 380's 10.8 L/100km (26 mpg UK, 22 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
