Chrysler 200 vs Mazda 626
The 626 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $60 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,745
- $2,682 (better)
- New Zealand
- $3,308
- $3,234 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £2,010
- £1,965 (better)
- United States
- $2,556
- $2,499 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 10.2 L/100km
- 10.0 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 587 km
- 640 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 453 L
- –
- Length
- 4,884 mm
- 4,690 mm
- Weight
- 1,613 kg
- 1,200 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.4 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 176 kW (better)
- 96 kW
- Torque
- 295 Nm (better)
- 178 Nm
- Gearbox
- 9-speed automatic
- 5-speed manual
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
200 or 626?
Which is cheaper to run, the Chrysler 200 or the Mazda 626?
The Mazda 626: about $60 a year less in Australia than the Chrysler 200 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Chrysler 200 or the Mazda 626?
The Mazda 626, at 10.0 L/100km (28 mpg UK, 24 mpg US) to the Chrysler 200's 10.2 L/100km (28 mpg UK, 23 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
