Chrysler Grand Voyager vs Ford C-max
The C-max costs less to run, by the official figures: about $460 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,042
- $1,578 (better)
- New Zealand
- $2,464
- $1,902 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,497
- £1,155 (better)
- United States
- $1,904
- $1,469 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 7.6 L/100km
- 5.9 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 997 km (better)
- 901 km
Space
- Seats
- 7
- 5
- Length
- 5,143 mm
- 4,379 mm
- Weight
- 1,800 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 3.3 L V6 petrol
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder hybrid
- Power
- 118 kW
- 141 kW (better)
- Torque
- 258 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 4-speed automatic
- CVT
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Grand Voyager or C-max?
Which is cheaper to run, the Chrysler Grand Voyager or the Ford C-max?
The Ford C-max: about $460 a year less in Australia than the Chrysler Grand Voyager at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Chrysler Grand Voyager or the Ford C-max?
The Ford C-max, at 5.9 L/100km (48 mpg UK, 40 mpg US) to the Chrysler Grand Voyager's 7.6 L/100km (37 mpg UK, 31 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
