GWM Tank vs Mitsubishi Outlander
The Outlander costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,093
- $2,084 (better)
- New Zealand
- $2,523
- $2,513 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,532
- £1,527 (better)
- United States
- $1,949
- $1,941 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 7.8 L/100km
- 7.8 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- –
- 708 km
Space
- Seats
- –
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 571 L
- Towing, braked
- –
- 1,600 kg
- Length
- –
- 4,710 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,635 kg
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol
- Power
- –
- 135 kW
- Torque
- –
- 245 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- CVT automatic (8 simulated ratios)
- Drive
- –
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- –
- 8
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Tank or Outlander?
Which is cheaper to run, the GWM Tank or the Mitsubishi Outlander?
The Mitsubishi Outlander: about $10 a year less in Australia than the GWM Tank at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the GWM Tank or the Mitsubishi Outlander?
The Mitsubishi Outlander, at 7.8 L/100km (36 mpg UK, 30 mpg US) to the GWM Tank's 7.8 L/100km (36 mpg UK, 30 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
