Holden Senator vs Mitsubishi Canter

The Canter costs less to run, by the official figures: about $50 a year less in Australia.

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Holden SenatorMitsubishi Canter

A typical year's fuel

Australia
$3,376
$3,323 (better)
New Zealand
$4,075
$4,010 (better)
United Kingdom
£2,476
£2,436 (better)
United States
$3,148
$3,098 (better)

Official figures

Uses
12.6 L/100km
12.4 L/100km (better)
On a full tank
–
806 km

Space

Seats
–
3

Engine

Engine
–
3.0 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
Power
–
110 kW
Torque
–
370 Nm
Gearbox
–
6-speed manual
Drive
–
RWD

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Senator or Canter?

Which is cheaper to run, the Holden Senator or the Mitsubishi Canter?

The Mitsubishi Canter: about $50 a year less in Australia than the Holden Senator at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Holden Senator or the Mitsubishi Canter?

The Mitsubishi Canter, at 12.4 L/100km (23 mpg UK, 19 mpg US) to the Holden Senator's 12.6 L/100km (22 mpg UK, 19 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way