Mazda CX-50 vs Mitsubishi RVR
The CX-50 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $1,659 (better)
- $1,669
- New Zealand
- $2,002 (better)
- $2,015
- United Kingdom
- £1,216 (better)
- £1,224
- United States
- $1,547 (better)
- $1,557
Official figures
- Uses
- 6.2 L/100km (better)
- 6.2 L/100km
- On a full tank
- –
- 963 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 493 L
- Length
- 4,724 mm
- 4,295 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,385 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 2.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 139 kW (better)
- 98 kW
- Torque
- 252 Nm (better)
- 175 Nm
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- CVT
- Drive
- AWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
CX-50 or RVR?
Which is cheaper to run, the Mazda CX-50 or the Mitsubishi RVR?
The Mazda CX-50: about $10 a year less in Australia than the Mitsubishi RVR at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Mazda CX-50 or the Mitsubishi RVR?
The Mazda CX-50, at 6.2 L/100km (46 mpg UK, 38 mpg US) to the Mitsubishi RVR's 6.2 L/100km (45 mpg UK, 38 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
