Mitsubishi Colt vs Nissan Cube
The Cube costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $1,434
- $1,420 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,730
- $1,714 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,051
- £1,041 (better)
- United States
- $1,337
- $1,324 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.4 L/100km
- 5.3 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 879 km (better)
- 868 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 203 L
- –
- Length
- 3,870 mm
- 3,980 mm
- Weight
- 1,015 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 1.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
- 1.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 80 kW
- 80 kW
- Torque
- 140 Nm
- 140 Nm
- Gearbox
- 5-speed manual
- CVT
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Colt or Cube?
Which is cheaper to run, the Mitsubishi Colt or the Nissan Cube?
The Nissan Cube: about $10 a year less in Australia than the Mitsubishi Colt at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Mitsubishi Colt or the Nissan Cube?
The Nissan Cube, at 5.3 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US) to the Mitsubishi Colt's 5.4 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
