Nissan March vs Škoda Citigo
The Citigo costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $1,246
- $1,230 (better)
- New Zealand
- $1,504
- $1,484 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £914
- £902 (better)
- United States
- $1,162
- $1,147 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 4.7 L/100km
- 4.6 L/100km (better)
- On a full tank
- 882 km (better)
- 763 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 4
- Boot
- –
- 251 L
- Length
- 3,780 mm
- 3,563 mm
- Weight
- –
- 929 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 1.2 L 3-cylinder petrol
- 1.0 L 3-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 58 kW (better)
- 55 kW
- Torque
- 106 Nm (better)
- 95 Nm
- Gearbox
- CVT
- 5-speed manual
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★☆
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
March or Citigo?
Which is cheaper to run, the Nissan March or the Škoda Citigo?
The Škoda Citigo: about $20 a year less in Australia than the Nissan March at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Nissan March or the Škoda Citigo?
The Škoda Citigo, at 4.6 L/100km (62 mpg UK, 51 mpg US) to the Nissan March's 4.7 L/100km (61 mpg UK, 51 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
