SsangYong Musso vs Volvo XC60
The Musso costs less to run, by the official figures: about $30 a year less in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- Australia
- $2,304 (better)
- $2,333
- New Zealand
- $2,781 (better)
- $2,814
- United Kingdom
- £1,690 (better)
- £1,709
- United States
- $2,149 (better)
- $2,174
Official figures
- Uses
- 8.6 L/100km (better)
- 8.7 L/100km
- On a full tank
- –
- 816 km
Space
- Seats
- –
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 490 L
- Length
- –
- 4,688 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,833 kg
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol mild hybrid
- Power
- –
- 184 kW
- Torque
- –
- 350 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- 8-speed automatic
- Drive
- –
- AWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Musso or XC60?
Which is cheaper to run, the SsangYong Musso or the Volvo XC60?
The SsangYong Musso: about $30 a year less in Australia than the Volvo XC60 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the SsangYong Musso or the Volvo XC60?
The SsangYong Musso, at 8.6 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 27 mpg US) to the Volvo XC60's 8.7 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 27 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
